Volume 10, Issue 4 (December 2023)
J. Food Qual. Hazards Control 2023, 10(4): 211-220 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
AL-Hmoud M, Yamani M. Microbial Quality of Halawet Eljibn, an Arabic Sweet Sold in the Retail Market in Jordan. J. Food Qual. Hazards Control 2023; 10 (4) :211-220
URL: http://jfqhc.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-1078-en.html
URL: http://jfqhc.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-1078-en.html
Department of Nutrition and Food Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan , myamani@ju.edu.jo
Abstract: (283 Views)
Background: Halawet eljibn is a popular Ready-to-Eat sweet in the Levant region. However, its non-machinery preparation and lack of final heating increase the risk of contamination by microorganisms that can cause food-borne illnesses. The study aimed to investigate the numbers of microorganisms present in commercially produced halawet eljibn in Jordan.
Methods: Sixty samples of halawet eljibn were collected from 15 sweet shops in Amman, Jordan at two intervals. Two sample units were taken from each sweet shop, and two reference samples were prepared under hygienic conditions for comparison purposes. The study evaluated the chemical properties of the samples, including moisture content, pH, and titratable acidity, and also assessed their microbiological quality through Aerobic Plate Count, Coliform Count, Lactic Acid Bacteria count, Staphylococcus aureus count, and yeast and mold count analyses.
Results: In this study, the samples exhibited a moisture content ranging from 40.9 to 49.8%, a pH range of 5.7 to 6.7, and acidity levels varying between 0.14 and 0.45%. The average Aerobic Plate Count and the counts of coliforms, Lactic Acid Bacteria, yeast and mold and S. aureus for halawet eljibn market samples were 6.6, 4.1, 6.8, 3.2, and 2.0 log Colony Forming Unit (CFU)/g, respectively. Counts of interval I (10th October-12th December) samples were significantly higher than those of interval II (19th December-10th January). The same average counts of the reference samples were significantly lower (2.3, <10, 1.6, 1.4, and <10 log CFU/g, respectively).
Conclusion: The study findings indicate that halawet eljibn provides an appropriate environment for microbial growth. The observed non-adherence to optimal hygienic practices during the production and handling of halawet eljibn underscores the need for more rigorous regulations to ensure its microbiological quality and safety.
DOI: 10.18502/jfqhc.10.4.14179
Methods: Sixty samples of halawet eljibn were collected from 15 sweet shops in Amman, Jordan at two intervals. Two sample units were taken from each sweet shop, and two reference samples were prepared under hygienic conditions for comparison purposes. The study evaluated the chemical properties of the samples, including moisture content, pH, and titratable acidity, and also assessed their microbiological quality through Aerobic Plate Count, Coliform Count, Lactic Acid Bacteria count, Staphylococcus aureus count, and yeast and mold count analyses.
Results: In this study, the samples exhibited a moisture content ranging from 40.9 to 49.8%, a pH range of 5.7 to 6.7, and acidity levels varying between 0.14 and 0.45%. The average Aerobic Plate Count and the counts of coliforms, Lactic Acid Bacteria, yeast and mold and S. aureus for halawet eljibn market samples were 6.6, 4.1, 6.8, 3.2, and 2.0 log Colony Forming Unit (CFU)/g, respectively. Counts of interval I (10th October-12th December) samples were significantly higher than those of interval II (19th December-10th January). The same average counts of the reference samples were significantly lower (2.3, <10, 1.6, 1.4, and <10 log CFU/g, respectively).
Conclusion: The study findings indicate that halawet eljibn provides an appropriate environment for microbial growth. The observed non-adherence to optimal hygienic practices during the production and handling of halawet eljibn underscores the need for more rigorous regulations to ensure its microbiological quality and safety.
DOI: 10.18502/jfqhc.10.4.14179
Type of Study: Original article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 23/02/27 | Accepted: 23/12/10 | Published: 23/12/30
Received: 23/02/27 | Accepted: 23/12/10 | Published: 23/12/30
References
1. Akpinar-Bayizit A., Ozcan T., Yilmaz-Ersan L. (2009). Milk-based traditional Turkish desserts. Mljekarstvo. 59: 349-355.
2. Ali M.Q., Chew S.C., Iftikhar S., Fatriasari W., Naeem K., Arif M.R., Yeoh S.Y., Minhas M. (2022). Effect of storage on physico-chemical, microbial and sensory evaluation of sweet based dairy products. Journal of Xi'an shiyou university, Natural Sciences Edition. 65: 8-24. [DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/K85MA]
3. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). (2005). Official method of analysis. Method 935.14 and 992.24. 18th edition. Washington, DC.
4. Aydin A., Aksu H., Taskanal N., Gunsen U. (2009). Microbiological, physico-chemical and toxicological quality of traditional Turkish cheese sweets. Food Quality. 32: 590-606. [DOI: 10.1111/j. 1745-4557.2009.00271.x] [DOI:10.1111/j.1745-4557.2009.00271.x]
5. Bremer P.J., Fletcher G.C., Osborne C. (2004). Staphylococcus aureus. New Zealand institute for crop and food research limited, Christchurch, New Zealand.
6. Centre for Food Safety (CFS). (2014). Microbiological guidelines for food (for ready-to-eat food in general and specific food items). Food and environmental hygiene department, Hong Kong. URL: https://www.cfs.gov.hk/english/food_leg/files/food_leg_Microbiological_Guidelines_for_Food_e.pdf.
7. Christelle A.-D.N.M., Athanase K.K., Théodore D.N.D., Clémen K.K. (2021). Physicochemical and microbial study of Dêguê, a dessert (From millet semolina and curd milk) sold on public markets in Daloa, Côte d'Ivoire. Academia Journal of Biotechnology. 9: 073-083. [DOI: 10.15413/ajb.2021.0012]
8. Cokal Y., Dagdelen A., Cenet O., Gunsen U. (2012). Presence of L. monocytogenes and some bacterial pathogens in two Turkish traditional foods, Mihalic cheese and Hosmerim dessert. Food Control. 26: 337-340. [DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.01.058] [DOI:10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.01.058]
9. Commission of the European Communities (EC). (2007). Commission regulation (EC) No 1441/2007 of 5 December 2007 amending regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European :union:. L322: 12-29. URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do? uri=OJ:L:2007:322:0012:0029:EN:PDF.
10. Dağ A. (2020). Assessment of microbiological quality of ready-to-eat foods in institutions providing mass feeding. Progress in Nutrition. 22: 68-74. [DOI: 10.23751/pn.v22i1.8243]
11. Faria-Oliveira F., Diniz R.H.S., Godoy-Santos F., Piló F.B., Mezadri H., Castro I.M., Brandão R.L. (2015). The role of yeast and lactic acid bacteria in the production of fermented beverages in South America. In: Eissa A.H.A. (Editor). Food production and industry. InTech, London, UK. pp: 107-135. [DOI: 10.5772/ 60877] [DOI:10.5772/60877]
12. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (1998). Bacteriological analytical manual. 8th edition. United States. URL: https://www. fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bacteriological-analytical-manual-bam.
13. Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ). (2013). Agents of foodborne illness. Staphylococcus aureus. 2nd edition. Australian Government's Health. Canberra, Australia. URL: https://www. foodstandards.gov.au/publications/Documents/Staphylococcus%20aureus.pdf.
14. Gao Z., Daliri E.B.-M., Wang J., Liu D., Chen S., Ye X., Ding T. (2019). Inhibitory effect of lactic acid bacteria on foodborne pathogens: a review. Journal of Food Protection. 82: 441-453. [DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-303] [DOI:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-303] [PMID]
15. Gilbert R.J., De Louvois J., Donovan T., Little C., Nye K., Ribeiro C.D., Richards J., Roberts D., Bolton F.J. (2000). Guidelines for the microbiological quality of some ready-to-eat foods sampled at the point of sale. PHLS advisory committee for food and dairy products. Communicable Disease and Public Health. 3: 163-167.
16. Guldas M., Bayizit A.A., Yilsay T.O., Yilmaz L. (2010). Effects of edible film coatings on shelf-life of mustafakemalpasa sweet, a cheese-based dessert. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 47: 476-481. [DOI: 10.1007/s13197-010-0081-6] [DOI:10.1007/s13197-010-0081-6] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Güven S., Demir H. (2010). Recipe development for production of a Turkish dessert, cheese halva. International Journal of Dairy Technology. 63: 581-586. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0307.2010. 00611.x] [DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0307.2010.00611.x]
18. Health Protection Agency (HPA). (2009). Guidelines for assessing the microbiological safety of ready-to-eat foods placed on the market. Health Protection Agency, London, UK. URL: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7efde0e5274a2e8ab497a4/Guidelines_for_assessing_the_microbiological_safety_of_ready-to-eat_foods_on_the_market.pdf.
19. Hoteit M., Al-Atat Y., Joumaa H., El Ghali S., Mansour R., Mhanna R., Sayyed-Ahmad F., Salameh P., Al-Jawaldeh A. (2021). Exploring the impact of crises on food security in Lebanon: results from a national cross-sectional study. Sustainability. 13: 8753. [DOI: 10.3390/su13168753] [DOI:10.3390/su13168753]
20. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (1998). Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs-horizontal method for the enumeration of mesophilic lactic acid bacteria-colony-count technique at 30 °C. ISO 15214: 1998. URL: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:15214:ed-1:v1:en.
21. Ismawati R., Romadhoni I.F., Nurul Q.T., Ratna S.T. (2019). Storability of seaweed jelly candy based on chemical, physical and microbiology characteristics. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 347: 012021. [DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/347/1/012021] [DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/347/1/012021]
22. Khalifa M.I., Dowidar H.A. (2022). Load of coliforms and fecal coliforms in dairy desserts in Aswan City. International Journal of Life Science Research Archive. 2: 41-46. [DOI: 10.53771/ ijlsra.2022.2.2.0037] [DOI:10.53771/ijlsra.2022.2.2.0037]
23. Knutson K. (2020). Nobody is talking about environmental monitoring. In: Knutson K (Editor). Food safety lessons for cannabis-infused edibles. Academic Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States. pp: 111-137. [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819512-3.00008-0] [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-819512-3.00008-0]
24. Kroning I.S., Iglesias M.A., Sehn C.P., Gandra T.K.V., Mata M.M., Da Silva W.P. (2016). Staphylococcus aureus isolated from handmade sweets: biofilm formation, enterotoxigenicity and antimicrobial resistance. Food Microbiology. 58: 105-111. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2016.04.001] [DOI:10.1016/j.fm.2016.04.001] [PMID]
25. Martin N.H., Evanowski R.L., Wiedmann M. (2023). Invited review: redefining raw milk quality-evaluation of raw milk microbiological parameters to ensure high-quality processed dairy products. Journal of Dairy Science. 106: 1502-1517. [DOI: 10.3168/jds.2022-22416] [DOI:10.3168/jds.2022-22416] [PMID]
26. Mataragas M., Metaxopoulos J., Galiotou M., Drosinos E.H. (2003). Influence of pH and temperature on growth and bacteriocin production by Leuconostoc mesenteroides L124 and Lactobacillus curvatus L442. Meat Science. 64: 265-271. [DOI: 10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00188-2] [DOI:10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00188-2] [PMID]
27. Mendonca A., Thomas-Popo E., Gordon A. (2020). Microbiological considerations in food safety and quality systems implementation. In: Gordon A. (Editor). Food safety and quality systems in developing countries. Academic Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States. pp: 185-260. [DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-814272-1.00005-X] [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-814272-1.00005-X]
28. Mwamakamba L., Mensah P., Fontannaz-Aujoulat F., Hlabana M., Maiga F., Bangoura F., Mohamed C., Ingenbleek L. (2012). The WHO five keys to safer food: a tool for food safety health promotion. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development. 12: 6245-6259. [DOI: 10.18697/ajfand.52.WHO-1] [DOI:10.18697/ajfand.52.WHO-1]
29. Odeh S.M.A., Yamani M.I. (2019). A Study of the chemical and microbiological quality of Baloryeh, Burma and Baklawa, traditional Arabic sweets produced in Jordan. Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences. 8: 120-128. [DOI: 10.15640/jaes.v8n1a12]. [DOI:10.15640/jaes.v8n1a12]
30. Ronge B.V., Desale R.J., Sonwalkar B.V. (2022). Studies on microbial parameters and shelf life of gulabjamun blended with coconut and wheat bran. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 11: 2811-2815.
31. Sahir K.H., Mirani Z.A., Khan M.N., Naz S., Khan S.I. (2013). Occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus in milk-based sweet products consumed in Karachi, Pakistan: short communication. Biological Sciences. 56: 56-58. [DOI: 10.52763/PJSIR.BIOL. SCI.56.1.2013.56.58] [DOI:10.52763/PJSIR.BIOL.SCI.56.1.2013.56.58]
32. Salloum H., Salloum M., Elias L.S. (2013). Sweet delights from a thousand and one nights: the story of traditional Arab sweets. Bloomsbury Publishing, New York, USA. [DOI:10.5040/9780755694341]
33. Sotohy S.A., Abdel Naby S.S., Sayed H.F., Ewida R.M. (2022). Microbiological quality assessment of dairy desserts sold in New Valley governorate. New Valley Veterinary Journal. 2: 28-35. [DOI: 10.21608/nvvj.2022.134120.1004] [DOI:10.21608/nvvj.2022.134120.1004]
34. Stewart C.M. (2003). Staphylococcus aureus and staphylococcal enterotoxins. In: Hocking A.D. (Editor). Foodborne microorganisms of public health significance. 6th edition. Sydney, Australia. pp: 359-380.
35. Yamani M.I., Al-Dababseh B.A. (1994). Microbial quality of hoummos (chickpea dip) commercially produced in Jordan. Journal of Food Protection. 57: 431-435. [DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-57.5.431] [DOI:10.4315/0362-028X-57.5.431] [PMID]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
