Volume 5, Issue 2 (June 2018)
J. Food Qual. Hazards Control 2018, 5(2): 41-48 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Carvalho M, Albano H, Teixeira P. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activities of Various Essential Oils Against Pathogenic and Spoilage Microorganisms . J. Food Qual. Hazards Control 2018; 5 (2) :41-48
URL: http://jfqhc.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-433-en.html
URL: http://jfqhc.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-433-en.html
Universidade Católica Portuguesa, CBQF - Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina – Laboratório Associado, Escola Superior de Bio-tecnologia, Rua Arquiteto Lobão Vital 172, 4200-374 Porto, Portugal , pcteixeira@porto.ucp.pt
Abstract: (5750 Views)
Background: Plant-derived Essential Oils (EOs) have shown remarkable antimicrobial activity against spoilage and pathogenic microorganisms isolated from food products. The objective of the current study was to determine in vitro antimicrobial effects of selected EOs against these microorganisms.
Methods: Antimicrobial activity of EOs against food-borne and spoilage microorganisms was screened by disk diffusion assay; then, the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimal Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) were determined. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 23.0 software for Windows.
Results: Oregano and thyme EOs showed the highest antimicrobial activity and the lowest MICs, while anise, fennel, garlic, and ginger showed a lower activity with significant differences (p<0.05). It was demonstrated that Salmonella Typhimurium, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, and Yersinia enterocolitica were the most sensitive bacteria to all the EOs tested (p<0.05). Among Gram-positive bacteria, Listeria innocua was demonstrated to be the most sensitive to most of the EOs (p<0.05). Furthermore, Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes were shown to be more sensitive than Enterococcus spp. (p<0.05). Yeasts were significantly (p<0.05) more sensitive than bacteria and were inhibited by most of the EOs.
Conclusion: The use of the analyzed EOs may be interesting to food processors because of their antimicrobial properties. However, it is necessary to test their use in food products and gauge their sensory implications.
DOI: 10.29252/jfqhc.5.2.3
Methods: Antimicrobial activity of EOs against food-borne and spoilage microorganisms was screened by disk diffusion assay; then, the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimal Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) were determined. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 23.0 software for Windows.
Results: Oregano and thyme EOs showed the highest antimicrobial activity and the lowest MICs, while anise, fennel, garlic, and ginger showed a lower activity with significant differences (p<0.05). It was demonstrated that Salmonella Typhimurium, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, and Yersinia enterocolitica were the most sensitive bacteria to all the EOs tested (p<0.05). Among Gram-positive bacteria, Listeria innocua was demonstrated to be the most sensitive to most of the EOs (p<0.05). Furthermore, Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes were shown to be more sensitive than Enterococcus spp. (p<0.05). Yeasts were significantly (p<0.05) more sensitive than bacteria and were inhibited by most of the EOs.
Conclusion: The use of the analyzed EOs may be interesting to food processors because of their antimicrobial properties. However, it is necessary to test their use in food products and gauge their sensory implications.
DOI: 10.29252/jfqhc.5.2.3
Type of Study: Original article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 18/03/03 | Accepted: 18/04/29 | Published: 18/06/23
Received: 18/03/03 | Accepted: 18/04/29 | Published: 18/06/23
References
1. Bakkali F., Averbeck S., Averbeck D., Idaomar M. (2008). Biological effects of essential oils - a review. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 46: 446-475. [DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2007.09.106]
2. Burt S. (2004). Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods - a review. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 94: 223-253. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.022]
3. Calo J., Crandal J.R., O'Bryan C.A., Ricke S.C. (2015). Essential oils as antimicrobials in food systems - a review. Food Control. 54: 111-119. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.12.040]
4. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI). (2012). Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved Standard – 9th Edition. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute.
5. Çoskun F., Siuri G.T., Demirci A.S. (2016). Anti-yeast effects of some commercial essential oils against food-related yeasts. IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food. 10: 83-88.
6. Dobre A.A., Gagiu V., Petru N. (2011). Antimicrobial activity of essential oils against food-borne bacteria evaluated by two preliminary methods. Romanian Biotechnological Letters. 16: 119-125.
7. García-Díez J., Alheiro J., Falco V., Fraqueza M.J., Patarata L. (2016). Chemical characterization and antimicrobial properties of herbs and spices essential oils against pathogens and spoilage bacteria associated to dry-cured meat products. Journal of Essential Oil Research. 29: 117-125. [DOI:10.1080/10412905.2016.1212738]
8. Ghabraie M., Vu D.K., Tata L., Salmieri S., Lacroix M. (2016). Antimicrobial effect of essential oils in combinations against five bacteria and their effect on sensorial quality of ground meat. LWT-Food Science Technology. 66: 332-339. [DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2015.10.055]
9. Gutierrez J., Barry-Ryan C., Bourke P. (2008). The antimicrobial efficacy of plant essential oil combinations and interactions with food ingredients. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 124: 91-97. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.02.028]
10. Hyldgaard M., Mygind T., Meyer R.L. (2012). Essential oils in food preservation: mode of action, synergies, and interactions with food matrix components - review. Frontiers in Microbiology. 25: 12. [DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00012]
11. Jayasen D., Jo C. (2013). Essential oils as potential antimicrobial agents in meat and meat products: a review. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 34: 96-108. [DOI:10.1016/j.tifs.2013.09.002]
12. Khosravi A.R., Shokri H., Kermani S., Dakhili M., Madani M., Parsa S. (2011). Antifungal properties of Artemisia sieberi and Origanum vulgare essential oils against Candida glabrata isolates obtained from patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis. Journal of Medical Mycology. 21: 93-99. [DOI:10.1016/j.mycmed.2011.01.006]
13. Kokkini S., Karausou R., Dardioti A., Keigas N., Lanaras T. (1997). Autumn essential oils of Greek oregano. Phytochemistry. 44: 883-886. [DOI:10.1016/S0031-9422(96)00576-6]
14. Krisch J., Pardi Z., Tserennadmid R., Papp T., Vágvölgyi C. (2010). Antimicrobial effects of commercial herbs, spices and essential oils in minced pork. Acta Biologica Szegediensis. 54: 131-134.
15. McLauchlin J., Hampton M.D., Shah S., Threlfall E.J., Wieneke A.A., Curtis G.D.W. (1997). Subtyping of Listeria monocytogenes on the basis of plasmid profiles and arsenic and cadmium susceptibility. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 83: 381-388. [DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2672.1997.00238.x]
16. Nazzaro F., Fratianni F., De Martino L., Coppola R., De Feo V. (2013). Effect of essential oils on pathogenic bacteria - review. Pharmaceuticals. 6: 1451-1474. [DOI:10.3390/ph6121451]
17. Nikaido H. (1994). Prevention of drug access to bacterial targets: permeability barriers and active efflux. Science. 264: 382-388. [DOI:10.1126/science.8153625]
18. Nikaido H. (2003). Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability revisited. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 67: 593-656. [DOI:10.1128/MMBR.67.4.593-656.2003]
19. Selim S. (2010). Antimicrobial activity of essential oils against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci (VRE) and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Feta soft cheese and minced beef meat. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 42: 187-196. [DOI:10.1590/S1517-83822010005000005]
20. Semeniuc C.A., Pop C.R., Rotar A.M. (2017). Antibacterial activity and interactions of plant essential oil combinations against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis. 25: 403-408. [DOI:10.1016/j.jfda.2016.06.002]
21. Sikkema J., De Bont J.A.M., Poolman B. (1995). Mechanisms of membrane toxicity of hydrocarbons. Microbiological Reviews. 59: 201-222.
22. Silva N., Alves S., Gonçalves A., Amaral J.S., Poeta P. (2013). Antimicrobial activity of essential oils from Mediterranean aromatic plants against several foodborne and spoilage bacteria. Food Science and Technology International. 19: 503-510. [DOI:10.1177/1082013212442198]
23. Sokovic M., Glamoclija J., Marin P.D., Brkie D., Van Griensven L.J.L.D. (2010). Antibacterial effects of the essential oils of commonly consumed medicinal herbs using an in vitro model. Molecules. 15: 7532-7546. [DOI:10.3390/molecules15117532]
24. Trombetta D., Castelli F., Sarpietro M.G., Venuti V., Cristani M., Daniele C., Saija A., Mazzanti G., Bisignano G. (2005). Mechanisms of antibacterial action of three monoterpenes. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 49: 2474-2478. [DOI:10.1128/AAC.49.6.2474-2478.2005]
25. Turgis M., Vu K.D., Dupont C., Lacroix M. (2012). Combined antimicrobial effect of essential oils and bacteriocins against foodborne pathogens and food spoilage bacteria. Food Research International. 48: 696-702. [DOI:10.1016/j.foodres.2012.06.016]
26. Zaika L.L. (1987). Spices and herbs: their antimicrobial activity and its determination. Journal of Food Safety. 9: 97-118. [DOI:10.1111/j.1745-4565.1988.tb00511.x]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
