Volume 6, Issue 1 (March 2019)
J. Food Qual. Hazards Control 2019, 6(1): 25-29 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ahmed S, Zim A, Rahman S, Ghosh S, Chhetri A, Ali M. Quality and Safety Assessment of Bangladeshi Pasteurized Milk. J. Food Qual. Hazards Control 2019; 6 (1) :25-29
URL: http://jfqhc.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-515-en.html
URL: http://jfqhc.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-515-en.html
Department of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Faculty of Food Science and Technology, Chittagong Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Khulshi, Chittagong-4225, Bangladesh , shaokat@cvasu.ac.bd
Abstract: (2801 Views)
Background: Milk is considered as one of the highly nutritious food for human. This study was undertaken to evaluate the physicochemical as well as the microbial quality of pasteurized milk of different brands available in Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Methods: Five types of branded pasteurized liquid milk were collected from retail markets of Chittagong, Bangladesh. Physicochemical analyses were carried out in order to determine the levels of pH, acidity, fat, protein, casein, specific gravity, Solids-Not-Fat (SNF), and total solids of the samples. Also, the samples were analyzed microbiologically to assess the total microbial loads and coliforms. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 23.0.
Results: The ranges of physicochemical parameters of the samples were determined, including specific gravity (1.024-1.031), pH (5.8-6.7), acidity (0.17±0.01-0.37±0.01%), total solids content (8.17-12.27%), SNF (7.28-8.49%), fat (0.89-3.78%), protein (3.42±0.09-3.63±0.02%), and casein content (2.66±0.07-2.82±0.02%). Statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were recorded among different milk brands for all physicochemical parameters except specific gravity. The highest and lowest amounts of total bacterial counts were 1150400 and 35500 CFU/ml, respectively. A significant difference (p<0.05) was found in bacterial loads among different brands of pasteurized milk.
Conclusion: This survey revealed that different brands of Bangladeshi pasteurized milk did not maintain the standard and acceptable quality.
DOI: 10.18502/jfqhc.6.1.455
Methods: Five types of branded pasteurized liquid milk were collected from retail markets of Chittagong, Bangladesh. Physicochemical analyses were carried out in order to determine the levels of pH, acidity, fat, protein, casein, specific gravity, Solids-Not-Fat (SNF), and total solids of the samples. Also, the samples were analyzed microbiologically to assess the total microbial loads and coliforms. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 23.0.
Results: The ranges of physicochemical parameters of the samples were determined, including specific gravity (1.024-1.031), pH (5.8-6.7), acidity (0.17±0.01-0.37±0.01%), total solids content (8.17-12.27%), SNF (7.28-8.49%), fat (0.89-3.78%), protein (3.42±0.09-3.63±0.02%), and casein content (2.66±0.07-2.82±0.02%). Statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were recorded among different milk brands for all physicochemical parameters except specific gravity. The highest and lowest amounts of total bacterial counts were 1150400 and 35500 CFU/ml, respectively. A significant difference (p<0.05) was found in bacterial loads among different brands of pasteurized milk.
Conclusion: This survey revealed that different brands of Bangladeshi pasteurized milk did not maintain the standard and acceptable quality.
DOI: 10.18502/jfqhc.6.1.455
Type of Study: Original article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 18/11/05 | Accepted: 19/02/01 | Published: 19/03/08
Received: 18/11/05 | Accepted: 19/02/01 | Published: 19/03/08
References
1. Al-Mazeedi H.M., Gholoum F.A., Akbar B.H. (2013). Microbiological status of raw and pasteurized milk in the state of Kuwait. International Journal of Engineering and Science. 3: 15-19.
2. Anderson M., Hinds P., Hurditt S., Miller P., McGrowder D., Alexander-Lindo R. (2011). The microbial content of unexpired pasteurized milk from selected supermarkets in a developing country. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 1: 205-211. [DOI: 10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60028-2] [DOI:10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60028-2]
3. AOAC. (1990). Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Virginia, USA.
4. Barłowska J., Szwajkowska M., Litwińczuk Z., Król J. (2011). Nutritional value and technological suitability of milk from various animal species used for dairy production. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 10: 291-302. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2011.00163.x] [DOI:10.1111/j.1541-4337.2011.00163.x]
5. Bangladesh Standard (BDS). (2002). Specification for pasteurized milk. Bangladesh Standards and Testing Institution. No. 1702.
6. Batt C.A., Tortorello M.L. (2014). Encyclopedia of food microbiology. 2nd edition. Elsevier, USA.
7. Chye F.Y., Abdullah A., Ayob M.K. (2004). Bacteriological quality and safety of raw milk in Malaysia. Food Microbiology. 21: 535-541. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2003.11.007] [DOI:10.1016/j.fm.2003.11.007]
8. Dey S., Karim M.H. (2013). Study on physicochemical and microbial quality of available raw, pasteurized and UHT milk during preservation. International Journal of Science Inventions Today. 2: 150-157.
9. El Zubeir I.E..M, Gabriechise V., Johnson Q. (2007). Study on some quality control measures of pasteurized milk of the Western Cape, South Africa. International Journal of Dairy Science. 2: 372-379. [DOI: 10.3923/ijds.2007.372.379] [DOI:10.3923/ijds.2007.372.379]
10. Fuquay J.W., Fox P.F., McSweeney P.L. (2011). Encyclopedia of dairy sciences. Academic Press, UK.
11. Guetouache M., Guessas B., Medjekal S. (2014). Composition and nutritional value of raw milk. Issues in Biological Sciences and Pharmaceutical Research. 2: 115-122. [DOI: 10.15739/ ibspr.005]
12. Hasan M.A., Islam M.A., Mahmud M.S., Uddin A.A., Ahmed S. (2015). Microbial analysis of raw and pasteurized milk from selected areas of Dinajpur, Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 1: 292-296. [DOI:10.3329/ajmbr.v1i2.25624]
13. Haug A., Høstmark A.T., Harstad O.M. (2007). Bovine milk in human nutrition–a review. Lipids in Health and Disease. 6: 25. [DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-6-25] [DOI:10.1186/1476-511X-6-25]
14. Imran M., Khan H., Hassan S.S., Khan R. (2008). Physicochemical characteristics of various milk samples available in Pakistan. Journal of Zhejiang University Science B. 9: 546-551. [DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B0820052] [DOI:10.1631/jzus.B0820052]
15. Jeffrey D.C., Wilson J. (1987). Effect of mastitis‐related bacteria on total bacterial count of bulk milk supplies. International Journal of Dairy Technology. 40: 23-26. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1471 -0307.1987.tb02829.x] [DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0307.1987.tb02829.x]
16. Lye Y.L., Afsah-Hejri L., Chang W.S., Loo Y.Y., Puspanadan S., Kuan C.H., Goh S.G., Shahril N., Rukayadi Y., Khatib A., John Y.H.T., Nishibuchi M., et al. (2013). Risk of Escherichia coli O157: H7 transmission linked to the consumption of raw milk. International Food Research Journal. 20: 1001-1005.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2013.02.031 [DOI:10.1016/j.febslet.2013.03.031] [PMID]
17. Prodhan U.K., Alam M.J., Sadia M.K., Sultana S., Hye M.A., Ahamed M.S. (2016). Study on the quality of commercial market milk available in Bangladesh. Annals Food Science and Technology. 17: 293-298.
18. Sarkar S. (2015). Microbiological considerations: pasteurized milk. International Journal of Dairy Science. 10:206-218. [DOI: 10.3923/ijds.2015.206.218] [DOI:10.3923/ijds.2015.206.218]
19. Woldemariam H.W., Asres A.M. (2017). Microbial and physicochemical qualities of pasteurized milk. Journal of Food Processing and Technology. 8: 651. [DOI: 10.4172/ 2157-7110. 1000651]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
