Compositions Nutrient and Antinutrients of Biscuits Prepared from Fermented and Unfermented Ternary Mixture Flours
P.O. Oleghe 1,2, F.C. Akharaiyi 2** , C.B. Ehis-Eriakha 2
1. Department of Biological Science Laboratory Technology, School of Applied Sciences and Technology, Auchi Polytechnic, Auchi, P.M.B. 13, Auchi, Edo State, Nigeria
2. Department of Microbiology, Edo State University Uzairue, KM 7 Auchi-Abuja Road, Iyamho Uzairue, Edo State, Nigeria
HIGHLIGHTS
- Fermentation increased the contents of crude fiber, and ash but reduced the moisture and fat contents. It can have a significant impact on the nutritional composition of the different biscuits, as demonstrated by the proximate analysis results.
- The fermented and the unfermented biscuits samples had similar protein content (11.918±0.08 and 9.074±0.09%, respectively).
- Fermentation enhanced the potassium bioavailability of the products from 19.803±0.00 to 25.264±0.05 ppm).
- Flavonoid content was more in the fermented mix 5 (23.85%) than the unfermented mix 2 that has a value of (18.14%).
Article type
Original article |
|
|
ABSTRACT
Background: The exorbitant cost of wheat-based foods in non-wheat growing countries has necessitated looking for more enriched and sustainable alternative flour from botanicals that can be mixed and used to produce baked products including biscuits. The study aimed to make biscuits using three different fermented and unfermented mixtures of flour (sweet potato, pigeon pea, and yellow maize).
Methods: Starch-rich tubers of yellow-fleshed cultivar of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas), yellow maize (Zea mays) grains, and pigeon peas (Cajanus cajan) seeds were purchased from food merchants in the Uchi market, located in Auchi area of Edo State, southern Nigeria in June 2022. These botanical samples were taxonomically validated. The samples were divided into two parts fermented and unfermented, prepared and produced into flour forms. The blended raw materials into flour were mixed in order of sweet potato: pigeon pea: maize (composite mix two 60.00:25.47:14.53, composite mix five 67.70:20.00:12.31 and composite mix eight 61.72:25.24:13.04) were selected to produce biscuits while 100% wheat was used as control. Biscuits were produced from the flour using a standard recipe. The obtained results were presented in mean±SD format of interpretations. Analytical significance dissimilarity between the means samples were considered based on one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using IBM Statistical software
Results: It revealed that fermentation increased techno-functional properties containing crude fiber (3.464±0.01-3.485±0.01) and ashes (3.688±0.11-3.711±0.11), while reducing fat (17.339±0.03) and moisture contents (3.639±0.05), the control had the highest protein (12.805±0.25) and lowest carbohydrate (55.622±0.12). The fermented biscuits had more flavonoids (23.162±0.36-23.852±0.60), saponins (14.793±0.07-23.495±0.03). Additionally, fermentation enhanced the potassium bioavailability of the products (19.803±0.00-25.264±0.05). There was high free radical scavenging activity and color for all the fermented samples than unfermented and controlled biscuits.
Conclusion: According to the research, ternary flour mixes from the botanicals could lead to products with improved nutritional composition, functional properties, and antioxidant attributes to further improve biscuit quality.
© 2024, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences. This is an open access article under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
Keywords
Flour
Fermentation
Triticum
Zea mays
Nigeria |
|
|
Article history
Received: 04 Jul 2023
Revised: 15 Oct 2023
Accepted: 25 Jan 2024 |
|
|
Acronyms and abbreviations
DPPH=1,1-Diphenyl-2-Picrylhydrazyl
FRAP=Ferric-Reducing Antioxidant Properties
ABTS=2,2’–Azino-Bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-Sulfonic acid) |
|
|
To cite: Oleghe P.O., Akharaiyi F.C., Ehis-Eriakha C.B. (2024). Compositions nutrient and antinutrients of biscuits prepared from fermented and unfermented ternary mixture flours. Journal of Food Quality and Hazards Control. 11: 13-25.
Introduction
Worldwide, the replacement of gluten-rich whole wheat-based flours that are appropriate and readily available as botanical flours has increased for baking food products (Hasmadi et al., 2020).
Among the notable Ready-to-Eat (RTE) snacks globally available, biscuit is one of the most popular. It is a low-cost baked snack product with numerous advantages including a wide-range consumer base, reasonably longer durability, superior handiness, nutritionally enriched bulk, and excellent mouth feel. There is a growing interest in biscuit products not only because of their nutritional enhancement status but also their potential to be used for various anti-hunger food initiatives as well as an intervention food meal, particularly in catastrophic circumstances resulting from human and natural causes (Chandra et al., 2015).
The magnitude of Nigeria’s biscuit manufacturing industry is calculated to be approximately 617 million American dollars, growing annually at 16% over the last five years. This prosperous industry is bolstered by imported Russian wheat as the country can barely produce up to 10% of the 5-6 million metric tons of wheat required annually for sustainable consumption as at year 2022 (Oleghe et al., 2023). All efforts to mitigate this, including the implementation of various baked wheat intervention programs supported by the Federal Government of Nigeria (FGN) have not been successful (Okojie, 2022); the FGN is left with little choice but to import the commodity. Records manifest that the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) expends over 2 billion American dollars of its insufficient foreign resources annually importing wheat (Azeez, 2021).
The exorbitant price of wheat-based food products has necessitated looking inwards for more enriched suitable and sustainable comparatively advantageous composite botanicals as alternative substitutes to wheat-based diets. Additionally, the continuous intake of wheat-based products has been connected to celiac disease, this has made the utilization of flours from mixed botanicals imperative in producing oven-baked food staples like biscuits (Kiin-Kabari and Giami, 2015). In order to replace wheat flour in the production of baked food staples, research studies in a number of developing countries are now concentrating on enhancing and analyzing the techno-functional as well as the physicochemical properties of indigenously cultivated crop flours (Kwofie et al., 2020).
Much literature has highlighted the usefulness of integrating fermentation procedures in improving the dietary and techno-functional characteristics of healthy gluten-free flour-based staple diet alternatives. The appropriateness of processing fermented and unfermented composite blends of botanical flours as another flour option, based on their techno-functional and physiochemical properties cannot be overlooked (Oleghe et al., 2023).
This study aimed to produce biscuits using three different ratios of composite-based botanical flours from sweet potato, pigeon pea, and maize; and carrying out techno-functional and physicochemical assessments on these products.
Materials and methods
Collection of botanical samples
Dry starch-rich tubers of yellow-fleshed cultivar of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) and yellow maize (Zea mays) grains as well as pigeon peas (Cajanus cajan) seeds, were procured locally from food merchants within the main local market in Auchi area of Edo State, southern Nigeria. These botanical samples were taxonomically validated. The botanical samples were divided into two parts. One part is for fermentation and the other is not to be fermented. The parts for fermentation were fermented for three days using the liquid-state fermentation method. After washing the samples with water, they were steeped in clean water for three days to ferment. After which, it was drained and spread out to dry. However, both the fermented and unfermented samples were dried prior to milling. Grinding machine (Thomas Wiley, model 5, United States of America) was utilized to grind the samples to obtain smooth flour.
Preparation and production of flour samples
The fermented and unfermented botanical samples were prepared and produced into their respective flour forms according to the methods of Oleghe et al. (2023). Using the Design Expert 13.0 D-optimal software for mixture in the food sector as explained by Squeo et al. (2021), the various formulations of the flour were obtained by selecting and blending the individual botanical flour portions by the developed design for the experiment. The obtained composite flours were ground with a grinding machine and then sealed properly in dry transparent containers.
Experimental design
Results from the experimental design software for the composite flour mixes obtained from sweet potato, maize, and pigeon pea yielded 11 runs (Table 1), the different combinations of these botanicals were measured and utilized in formulating the respective fermented and unfermented composite mixes. Based on the proximate and the techno-functional results, three composite mixes (2, 5, and 8) were further selected and used in producing the biscuit products.
Table 1: Experimental design for composite flour mixes
| Run |
Component 1
A: sweet potato g/100 g |
Component 2
B: pigeon per g/100 g |
Component 3
C: corn g/100 g |
| 1 |
60.000 |
29.998 |
10.002 |
| *2 |
60.000 |
25.470 |
14.530 |
| 3 |
64.787 |
20.000 |
15.000 |
| 4 |
64.630 |
25.370 |
10.000 |
| *5 |
67.695 |
20.000 |
12.305 |
| 6 |
63.223 |
23.493 |
13.274 |
| 7 |
61.576 |
26.929 |
11.497 |
| *8 |
61.716 |
25.241 |
13.044 |
| 9 |
67.233 |
22.767 |
10.000 |
| 10 |
69.997 |
20.003 |
10.000 |
| 11 |
65.554 |
21.958 |
12.288 |
* selected
Preparation of biscuits
The recipes stated by Onabanjo and Ighere (2014) were adjusted and adopted here. The used recipe was: flour (100 g), fat (63 g), honey (25 ml), 1 g of table salt, 20 ml of whole egg, 5 g of powdered milk, biscuits baking powder (5 g), 5 ml egg white and water (20-60 ml). The egg white was used as gluten replacement while the control was whole wheat flour (100%). The butter and honey were mixed using a hand mixer (Guangzhou Home Machinery Co., Ltd, China), thereafter, to achieve the desired texture for biscuit dough, flour, egg white, baking powder, and milk were added and properly combined. The desired thickness of the dough was attained by hand-kneaded on a rotating table. A biscuit cutter (Surya Bakery Machine, India) was used to cut the dough into sizes and arrange it into different shapes on a baking tray lined with parchment paper. It was then oven-baked with 2 Deck 4 Tray+8 Tray Proofer, China for 15 min at 160 oC, then allowed to cool down, and packed.
Determination of proximate composition
-Ash content determination
The method of AOAC (2012) was adopted. In a clean and dry crucible, 5 g of sample was weighed. The crucible with the sample was then placed on a hot plate for the removal of organic matter and thereafter, transferred to a muffle furnace (IndiaMART, India) regulated at 600 oC for 5 h. After the heating process, the sample was placed in a desiccator to cool down before taking the weight.
Ash percentage=(crucible’s weight+ash)-(empty crucible’s weight)×100/Sample’s weight
-Moisture content estimation
The criteria described by AOAC (2012) were used. Five g sample of the flour was obtained and placed in a crucible with a specified load and thereafter positioned in an oven regulated at 650 oC and left for 1 h. After the heating period, it was removed from the oven and weighed. This process was repeated for a consistent weight to be achieved.
Moisture content=(W2-W1)-(W3-W1)×100/W2-W1
Where, W1 is the empty weight of crucible; W2 is the total weight of sample and crucible; W3 is the mass of crucible with dry sample.
-Crude fat determination
The described criterion by AOAC (2012) was adopted. Five g of sample was weighed into a fat-free extraction thimble and sealed tightly. The thimble containing the sample was then positioned in an extractor that was attached to a reflux condenser (1,508 condenser reflux, India). A 250 ml soxhlet flask (Pirex, England) was filled with petroleum ether to the third quarter (¾) of the flask. The set-up was placed in a muffle furnace for 6 h for extraction under a flow of tap water to aid the condensation of the petroleum ether. After this, the flask containing the sample was removed and transferred to an oven regulated at 65 oC for 4 h. Thereafter, the flask was removed from the oven to cool down before weighing.
-Crude fiber determination
The AOAC (2012) method for the determination of crude fiber was adopted. Five g of the flour sample was measured into a 500 ml beaker. Two hundred ml of preheated 1.25% sulfuric acid (H2SO4; Merk, Darmstadt, Germany) was mixed with the sample and then placed in a regulated digestion apparatus. It was then refluxed for 30 m and filtered with No 1 Whatman filter paper. The obtained residue was boiled in hot distilled water until a neutral filtrate was acquired. The residue was then conveyed into a clean crucible and dried for 24 h at 60 oC. The combined weight of the sample which was labelled as “A” was recorded. Thereafter, the crucible with the sample was placed in a furnace regulated at 600 oC. Afterwards, it was re-weighed and labelled as “B”
% Crude fiber=(DWR-WR)×100/SW
WR: weight of the residue; DWR: denotes WR weight of the residue after ashing; and SW represents the sample’s weight.
-Protein content determination
The Kjeldahl nitrogen criterion as described by AOAC (2012) was used. Ten ml of concentrated H2SO4 and one kjeldahl catalyst tablet were mixed with the sample. The mixture was then digested for 4 h. Thereafter, the sample was cooled and transferred into a conical flask and combined with 5 ml of 40% sodium hydroxide (NaOH; Merk, Darmstadt, Germany) and 10 ml of boric acid was then add up with indicator solution and placed at the receiving top of the condenser. The sample was later titrated against a 0.01 N concentration of hydrochloric acid (HCl; Merk, Darmstadt, Germany).
% Nitrogen=14×VA×0.1×W×100/100
VA=volume of used acid, while
W=sample’s weight
The percentage crude protein is calculated as Nitrogen×6.25.
-Carbohydrate determination
Difference was used to determine the carbohydrate content of the flour samples. This was performed by calculating the difference as stated in the method described by AOAC (2016). The content of the carbohydrate was estimated by subtraction of the total percentage of other components which include ash, moisture, fat, and protein from 100 employing the calculation stated below.
-Determination of tannin
The criteria of Govindappa et al. (2011) were adopted where 2 g each of flour sample was weighed and placed into a beaker of 250 ml capacity. Subsequently, 200 ml of 0.004 M K3Fe (CN)6 (Merk, Darmstadt, Germany) and 10 ml of 0.008 M ferric chloride (FeCl3; Merk, Darmstadt, Germany) in 1.00 M HCl were add up to the flask containing the sample. The flask with the sample was stood for 20 min, with occasional stirring at intervals of 10 min. Subsequently, 1 ml aliquots were withdrawn from the mixture, and a cocktail containing 2 ml of 0.008 M FeCl3 in 0.008 M HCl and 10 ml of 0.0015 M K3Fe (CN)6 was added. After 30 s, the absorbance was measured at 720 nm, using a blank for comparison:
Tannin (mg/g)=Sample’s absorbance×concentration of the standard×dilution factor/The standard absorbance×size of sample
-Determination of flavonoid
The aluminium chloride (AlCl3) (ProChem, Inc, USA) colorimetric assay as stated by Singh et al. (2012) was adopted for the estimation of total flavonoid in the biscuit samples. In a 10 ml conical flask, 5 g of biscuit sample was mixed with 20 ml of methanol. Five ml of 10% AlCl3 and 5 ml of 1 M of potassium acetate (CH3COOK) (Vizag chemical, India) were add up to the mixture. Distilled water was added up to the mixture to make up a volume of 2,500 ml. Thereafter, it was incubated for 30 min at a room temperature of 27±2 oC. The sample’s absorbance was read at 415 nm against a blank with a spectrophotometer (SP-UV 5,100, Model: SP-UV 5,100, China). Using quercetin as the standard, the flavonoid in the sample was calculated with the below equation:
Flavonoids content (mg Quercetin Equivalent (QE)/g)=Abssample×conc. of the standard (mg/ml)/Absstandard×con. of the sample (mg/g)
The standard absorbance is the absorbance of a containing 500 µl quercetin in 50 µl of 100% AlCl3 and 1 M of ethanoic acid (CH2COOK). The blank represents the mixtures of 500 µl of distilled water, 50 µl of distilled water, 500 µl of methanol, and 1 M CH3COOK.
-Determination of saponin
The criterion described by Mhada et al. (2020) was adopted for saponin content determination in the biscuits. Twenty g of each biscuit sample was dissolved in 100 ml of 20% ethanol and heated in a water bath regulated at a temperature of 55 oC for 4 h and with a continuous stirring. The mixture was filtered to obtain residue. The residue was then re-extracted by the addition of 200 ml of 20% ethanol. The filtrates were put together and concentrated to 40 ml in a water bath regulated at a temperature of 90 oC. Thereafter, the concentrated residue was removed and placed in a 250 ml separating funnel where it was mixed with 20 ml of diethyl ether by vigorously shaking. By this, we recovered the aqueous layer and discarded the ether layer. The process was repeated and 60 ml of n-butanol was then added. The aqueous layer mixed with butanol was then washed two times by adding 10 ml of 5% aqueous solution of sodium chloride (NaCl). The left solution was evaporated by heating water. After this, the samples were oven-dried to obtain a constant weight. The content of the saponin was then estimated in mg/g.
-Determination of oxalate
The criteria analyzed by Karamad et al. (2019) were employed. A 2 g portion of the biscuit samples was subjected to digestion using 10 ml of 6M HCl for duration of 1 h. The resulting mixture was then brought to make a volume of 250 ml in a volumetric flask. A concentrated solution of NH4OH was utilized to adjust the pH of the filtrate until the color changed from pink to pale yellow. Following this, a 5% CaCl2 aqueous solution was added for the precipitation of insoluble oxalate that might be present in the mixture. The obtained suspension was thereafter centrifuged at a speed of 2,500 rpm for 10 min the supernatant was carefully emptied into a container. The obtained precipitate from the centrifugation step was mixed with 10 ml of 20% (v/v) H2SO4 and the resulting solution obtained was subsequently brought to a final volume of 300 ml. A measure of 125 ml solution was subjected to heat up to nearly its point of boiling and thereafter was titrated against a standardized solution of 0.05 M of potassium permanganate (KMnO4) for 30 s to reach a faintly pink color. The observation on the burette at this point was recorded and used to estimate the content of oxalate in the biscuit sample.
Oxalate (mg/g)=titre value×volume of KMnO4×dilution factor/Sample size
Determination of trypsin inhibitor
The trypsin inhibitor in the biscuits was evaluated with the procedure established by Szmigielski et al. 2010. Fifty ml of 0.01 N NaOH was applied to mix 1 g of the biscuit sample. This was performed at a pH that ranged from 8.4 to 10.00. This was turned continuously for 3 h. Two ml of the solution was pipetted into a test tube. Subsequently, 2 ml of cold trypsin solution (4 mg in 200 ml of 0.001 M HCl) were added to clean test tubes. The test tubes with the biscuit samples were placed in an incubator at a temperature of 37 oC. A substrate solution, Benzoyl-DL-arginine-P-nitroanilide hydrochloride (BAPNA; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was prepared by dissolving 40 mg in 1 ml of dimethyl sulfoxide and adding more of 0.05 M tris buffer at pH of 8.2 to make up to 100 ml. Five ml of the BAPNA substrate solution was added up to the test tubes for 10 m and hindered the reaction by adding a volume of 30% acetic acid, and the contents of each test tube were stirred to mix very well. The mixtures contained in the tubes were subjected to centrifugation at 3,000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant so obtained was read in a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 410 nm against a blank of reagent. A reference solution was prepared in the same manner as the sample, only that 2 ml of distilled water was add up instead of the biscuit samples.
Mineral analysis
Using the dry ash criteria, 1 g of each of the biscuit samples was weighed precisely into various crucibles and then transferred to a muffle kiln for ashing at a temperature of 550 oC until all carbon substances were completely burnt. The crucible (containing the ash) was taken off and transferred into separate desiccators for cooling. Thereafter, 10 ml of 0.1 M HCl solution was pipetted into each crucible containing the biscuit sample for the dissociation of ash and percolation of the mineral elements. The crucibles were washed three times with 0.1 M HCl solution, the volume was subsequently adjusted to 100 ml using deionized water.
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) (Infitek, China) was used to analyze iron (Fe), magnesium (Mg), zinc (Zn), and calcium (Ca), while the flame photometer (Dongguan Xin Bao Instrument Co. Ltd, China) was employed to analyze potassium (K) and sodium (Na) and the Vanodo-molybdate method was utilized to analyze phosphorus (P). A stock solution was made ready for each metal utilizing their relevant metal salts to set up their standard curve (AOAC, 2012).
Determination of antioxidant activities
-Free radical scavenging activity
The authority of Matamane et al. (2020) was followed. Ten g of the biscuit sample was dissolved in 1 ml of buffer containing 0.1 M sodium phosphate and 1% (w/v) Triton X-100 at a pH of 7.0. 1,1-Diphenyl-2-Picrylhydrazyl (DPPH; Wuhan Golden Wing Idustry & Trade Co. Ltd, China) was mixed up in a methanol solution to make up a final concentration of 100 μM. Then, 100 μl of the protein fractions were dissolved in 100 μl of the DPPH suspension in a 96-well plate to reach a final assay concentration of 1 mg/ml, and the mixture was left for 30 min in the dark at a room temperature of 27±2 oC. The value of the absorbance of the blank, the control Glutathione (GSH), and samples were read at 517 nm. The negative control consisted of sodium phosphate buffer in place of the protein fractions, while GSH served as the positive control. The percent DPPH radical scavenging activity of the samples was calculated with the below formula:
% radical scavenging activity DPPH =